Re: [F_minor] (no subject)

[Randy Walld <Randy_Walld@cpe.umanitoba.ca>]

The fact that you noticed 'nothing unusual' is itself amazing!  Comparing it 
to a 'repressing' misses the point entirely.  Is this 24k Gould or not??

----- Original Message -----
From: paul wiener <pwiener@ms.cc.sunysb.edu>
Date: Monday, June 4, 2007 10:49 am
Subject: Re: [F_minor] (no subject)

> I got a copy. I have a reasonably excellent, if normal sound 
> system - several.
> 
> Other than perfect clarity, I  didn't notice anything unusual 
> about 
> the recording.  Of course, it's far, far better than any of the 
> conventional repressings of the 1955 version. The jacket info with 
> the disc says it should optimally be played on special equipment 
> or 
> headphones; perhaps I'm an atypical listener - I still depend a 
> lot 
> on my ears, speakers and amplifier. And on Gould's musicianship.
> 
> 
> 
> >so, what's the word. it that new reproduced, or should I say 
> >resurrected, 55 goldberg any good.      ?
> >_______________________________________________
> >F_minor mailing list
> >F_minor@email.rutgers.edu
> >https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> F_minor mailing list
> F_minor@email.rutgers.edu
> https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor
> 

_______________________________________________
F_minor mailing list
F_minor@email.rutgers.edu
https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor