[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
OK, so what is the point?
At 12:31 PM 6/4/2007, Randy Walld wrote:
The fact that you noticed 'nothing unusual' is itself amazing! Comparing it
to a 'repressing' misses the point entirely. Is this 24k Gould or not??
----- Original Message -----
From: paul wiener <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Monday, June 4, 2007 10:49 am
Subject: Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
> I got a copy. I have a reasonably excellent, if normal sound
> system - several.
> Other than perfect clarity, I didn't notice anything unusual
> the recording. Of course, it's far, far better than any of the
> conventional repressings of the 1955 version. The jacket info with
> the disc says it should optimally be played on special equipment
> headphones; perhaps I'm an atypical listener - I still depend a
> on my ears, speakers and amplifier. And on Gould's musicianship.
> >so, what's the word. it that new reproduced, or should I say
> >resurrected, 55 goldberg any good. ?
> >F_minor mailing list
> F_minor mailing list
F_minor mailing list