[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shouldn't this list be called G minor (for GG)?

To: "jerry and judy" <jerbidoc@zianet.com>, f_minor@email.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: Shouldn't this list be called G minor (for GG)?
From: "Sven-S. Porst" <ssp@earthling.net>
Date: 22 Feb 99 18:46:21 +0100
Delivered-to: f_minor-og@email.rutgers.edu
Sender: owner-f_minor@email.rutgers.edu

>Are you intimating that Glenn had a sunny character? 
>Or are referring to him as a 'major' artist etc.?

I just thought of the letters - and capital 'G's seem to be quite popular
on this mailing list. Furthermore GG seems quite a major subject for the
participants. By giving the even more more ridiculous G-Major example I
wanted to point out, where thinking about different names might get us...
and considering 'G' one major work in G-Major pops into my mind
immediately.

>You might not believe me, but the first disc was stolen in a
>burglary! [...] This is the Gould-honest truth!  

It seems quite unrealistic to me...

		Sven

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sven-S. Porst                                        ssp@earthling.net
http://www.stud.uni-goettingen.de/~sporst        PGP Key ID 0x5E4FC159
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shouldn't this list be called G minor (for GG)?
  - From: jerry and judy <jerbidoc@zianet.com>

Prev by Date: Shouldn't this list be called G minor (for GG)?
Next by Date: re: Klavierstuke GG
Previous by thread: Shouldn't this list be called G minor (for GG)?
Next by thread: Re: Shouldn't this list be called G minor (for GG)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread