Re: GG: New list for Rach, please

["Mark Williamson" <mwilliamson@alston.com>]

     Well, I don't know if I agree with that, although you are 
     the majordomo so you get to decide.  I belive this 
     Rachmaninoff discussion started as an inquiry into what if 
     anything Mr. Gould had recorded and related questions.  I 
     simply read all of these messages but was compelled to 
     comment at the end.
     
     But that is OK if you want to declare Rachmaninoff 
     off-limits:  I am only humble pawn in chess game of life.


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: GG: New list for Rach, please
Author:  Mary Jo Watts <mwatts@rci.rutgers.edu> at internet
Date:    5/7/97 4:50 PM


I'd like to suggest that those of you who are interested in the Rach. 
thread to go ahead and please start a new mailing list.  *This* list is 
to discuss Glenn Gould and his ideas and related tangents. The latest 
threads, interesting though they may be, are generating too much off 
topic traffic.
     
So for the energetic soul who has an academic email account and faculty 
status plus the two extra hours a day it takes to maintain a majordomo 
list (for free), I suggest you get in touch with your systems folks as 
most universities have mailing list capabilities.  Also many commercial 
servers out there will host the list.  Some WWW searches should yield 
the needed info and I'd be happy to give advice off the list at my 
private e-mail.  Advice on keeping the list on topic and putting out 
flames is available at the low price of 59.95 US$ ! ;-).
     
Mary Jo Watts,
listowner, f_minor
mwatts@rci.rutgers.edu