[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gould Bias
Greg Romero wrote:
> I'm suffering from a malady, and I'm wondering if other GG fans
>experience it too. Once I've heard GG play a work, it's spoiled for me. ...
Yes, I agree, with the exception of Ivo P's op111 arieta and some of
Andras Schiff's recent stuff. As for the rest -- Arrau in particular but
also Kempff and many others -- they sound terrible, even to me, a
non-musician, once I've heard the Gould interpretation. In fact, even if
I haven't heard the GG interpretation: if I spot a pianist Slowing Down
Because That's The Way To Play Bach Who's Really A Romantic -- surely a
capital offence -- I no longer listen to him or her. They're dead meat
('Hey, cut the Adagio -- use dis new CarneMorto Doloroso'). I used to
wonder in my teens and twenties why people liked JSB's piano music until
one day I heard GG. From then on, the rest were just The Rest.
>...same concerto. I realized I couldn't hear the songs hidden in the left
>hand, which come through so beautifully with Gould. And in the passages...
Nail on the head, Greg. For me there are two infuriating bits of
Beethoven: the twiddly 'birdcall' bit in Symphony #6 and the descending
scale bit in the scherzo (third movement) of Symphony #3, both of which
(I think) are in 3/4 or 6/8 time. LvB superimposes a temporary and false
4/4 time (or some other musical subterfuge) to trip up the non-musician
like me. And the wily old bastard (Aussie term of affection) succeeds
every time. It drives me mad. I read the score, tap out the time and
_still_ can't repeat what the orchestra plays.
Enter Glenn Gould and the Liszt transcription of the Pastoral, and
suddenly all is made clear. GG's left hand delicately chomps out the
underlying beat while his right hand deftly clears what LvB's orchestral
score deliberately muddied -- and, I think, you can hear him singing the
Dead March bit from Sym#7 Mov#2 in the background. If only GG had
recorded Liszt's transcription of the Eroica.
Of course it goes far deeper than that. When I listen to a GG
interpretation of just about anything I'm usually confident that I'm
hearing what no other pianist can give me. Anthony Burgess said of James
Joyce that he was the only writer to have successfully subsumed his
character in everything he wrote. Even when you know that Joyce is
writing autobiographically you cannot be sure that what he writes has
anything to do with actual events or emotions taken from his life. With
Gould the exact opposite seems to be true: everything he plays has the
stamp of Gould on it and faithfully reflects his character and belief.
I don't know about other non-musicians, but for me Gould is enough. I
don't want any other interpretations of a piece, just GG's. Others would
confuse and unsettle me. Gould may be wrong on the odd occasion, but he's
still my country and I'm a patriot. [Tut, tut -- too much emotion. Sign
off now, you imbecile.]
Best regards,
Tim Conway
<tpconway@ozemail.com.au>