[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Tangentially GG...actually baroque
At 03:57 23/05/96 -0500, you wrote:
>1. A diatonic (as opposed to chromatic), cantabile or "hummable" theme.
>(You can usually translate a Mozart theme into a Bach theme by getting rid
>of the accidentals!)
I would argue exactly the opposite! especially in regard to Mozart. As the
harmonic system of the Baroque wasn't as defined as it was in the Classical
period, there is a lot more chromaticism. I would also disagree with the
"hummable". Mozart is more hummable than Bach, or Vivaldi for that matter.
[These are all gross generalizations I realize].
>
>2. There is a(n) (fairly) independent bass line.
Yep. Ok.
>3. The middle voices at least *try* to create melodies of their own. In
>post-baroque music, the middle voices don't even try to *hide* the fact
>that they're there mainly to complete the *chords* (of which there would
>typically be three or four). This was epitomized by Johann Strauss jr. and
>Franz Lehar. (Just picture what it would be like to play second violin in
>"The Merry Widow"!)
I'd rather die. Alto lines in most vocal works are also included in this
horrible picture.
>4. The main theme(s) get(s) mentioned in other voices than the top
>(soprano) one.
Or to put it another way, there is less definition between the voices.
------------------------------------------
Bruce Petherick |
24 Hour emergency Musicologist |
|
Ask about our new emergency conducting, |
Piano and accompanying service! |
|
b.petherick@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au |
------------------------------------------