[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [F_minor] Glenn Gould



Chester hopes for a new Gould-like figure to emerge. If you hope and look hard enough, one WILL emerge - possibly on American Idol. That's not the way charismatic geniuses make their mark, however. Such figures are always a surprise! Gould emerged out of his times , before the internet, before Bach was brilliantly interpreted and performed by many other pianists, before a world that worships celebrity, less than half a century after the birth of the recording industry, and before a world where good music can be dialed up on cell phones. Like any unique creative genius, he was there at the right time, when we needed him most, not when we wanted him. He was there to usher in a new era of music as a technology. If there is a backlash against Gould developing, it's probably thanks in part to the many fans who have hungrily overhyped him and to our wishful tendency to separate musical experience from mental experience. Two recent books explore the neurological aspects of musical memory and reception, and will help us learn why we hear what we hear: Oliver Sacks' Musicophilia, and Daniel Levitin's This Your Brain on Music.

Since his death many other geniuses have emerged in many of the arts (let's not forget his contemporary Leonard Bernstein).

At 02:19 PM 1/22/2008, Robert Merkin wrote:
I think the question lurking beneath Chester's question is: Who are we?

Are we people simply and honestly mesmerized with Glenn Gould's achievements and life?

Or have we also assumed the responsibility of evangelizing and proselytising Glenn Gould to the Great Unwashed (particularly to teenagers and college students)? Are we also the active guardians and apostles of his legacy? Are we draymen hauling Glenn Gould into the future?

Does it suffice to kick back, disconnect the phone, and listen to an hour of Byrd and Gibbons on a nice stereo in a comfortable chair?

Or are we morphing into people who knock on the doors of strangers and offer them a chatty, upbeat introduction to Glenn Gould, and some full-color pamphlets, or a free DVD?

I don't know ... take Caruso as an example. After he died, how important was an army of his surviving admirers to making him an idol and superstar of the recorded music era? Or does Caruso keep hurtling into the future for the inherent content of his squawky cylinders alone?

For his entire career, from bobbysoxer teen phenom to death, Sinatra attended obsessively to his fan base -- personal letters and cards, personally autographed photos to any fan who asked, numerous in-person visits to local fan clubs. One high-class magazine article about this -- possibly Esquire -- felt that, beyond Sinatra's inherent great talents, his attention to the folks in the audience played a great role in his ultimate success. (Remember Dick Haymes? Eddy Fisher survives today pretty entirely on his marriage to Debby Reynolds and Elizabeth Taylor. Maybe they weren't taking care of the fans.)

It seems to me that an artist's path to the future is pretty much a crapshoot, and depends on the arbitary whims and accidents of society and industry, of economic and legal forces. There's a six or seven year Hole in the middle of Prince's most creative years during which he and Warners were having intractible contract disputes -- the world was pretty much denied access to any new work, and he intentionally fought back by not working.

Or perhaps poor product placement -- somebody takes Gene Kelly's delightful, charming, innocent "Singin' in the Rain" and gives it an indelible association with brutal sociopathic teenagers (one of whom sincerely loves Beethoven).

I don't know, dare we let Glenn find his own path to the future without too much of our active help and interference? Perhaps this is the moment to stop taking worlwide popularity polls, which strikes me as being a lot like tracking cocoa futures?

Of course it's a pleasure equal to music itself to share beautiful music with others. But, of just the performances, can we trust in their inherent power to keep Glenn Gould as popular with future listeners as Caruso? Or do we need to shower them with ballyhoo and comments left on YouTube? Do we have a mission, and how consonant would our mission seem to the dead gentleman himself? "32 Short Films" plays with these themes of the relations between Glenn Gould and the Outside World. They were very complicated.

Bob
Massachusetts USA



> [Original Message]
> From: paul wiener <pwiener@ms.cc.sunysb.edu>
> To: Singh <k_dawg71@hotmail.com>; Brad Lehman <bpl@umich.edu>; <f_minor@email.rutgers.edu>
> Date: 1/22/2008 11:13:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [F_minor] Glenn Gould
>
> This would be more or less upsetting if some facts came with it.
>
>
> At 11:48 AM 1/20/2008, Singh wrote:
>
> >Just two days ago, my teacher told me something extremely troubling.
> >Ratings of Glenn Gould's recordings have gone done alot in the past
> >short while. This, for me, points out the resurgence of everything
> >Glenn Gould philosophically tried to disprove. It shows the
> >resurgence of traditionalism, and an increased taste for
> >traditionalist recordings from the general public.
> >I just thought everyone should know. However, this also gives an
> >opportunity for another Glenn Gould-like figure to emerge. And we
> >can only hope,
> >
> >Chester Singh
+

_______________________________________________ F_minor mailing list F_minor@email.rutgers.edu https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor