[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [F_minor] (no subject)

To: F_MINOR@email.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
From: Brad Lehman <bpl@umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:23:46 -0400
Delivered-to: F_MINOR@email.rutgers.edu
In-reply-to: <200706052016.l55KG1aC022601@mail.cc.sunysb.edu>
List-archive: <https://email.rutgers.edu/pipermail/f_minor>
List-help: <mailto:f_minor-request@email.rutgers.edu?subject=help>
List-id: A discussion about the life and work of Glenn Gould<f_minor.email.rutgers.edu>
List-post: <mailto:f_minor@email.rutgers.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor>,<mailto:f_minor-request@email.rutgers.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor>,<mailto:f_minor-request@email.rutgers.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1181067141.4665a785b0476@webmail.nd.edu> <BAY108-F328A5F2265395C45161C2AE8200@phx.gbl><200706052016.l55KG1aC022601@mail.cc.sunysb.edu>
Sender: f_minor-bounces@email.rutgers.edu
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)

Gould's Goldberg may not be perfection, but who would deny that Bach's Goldberg was?

For what it's worth: Bach himself kept making handwritten corrections and changes in his own copy of the piece, *after* it was published.

And this set of Bach's changes wasn't available until the mid-1970s....


Brad Lehman
_______________________________________________
F_minor mailing list
F_minor@email.rutgers.edu
https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor

References:
- Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
  - From: aboikov@nd.edu
- Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
  - From: "Chester Singh" <k_dawg71@hotmail.com>
- Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
  - From: paul wiener <pwiener@ms.cc.sunysb.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [F_minor] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread