[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Sentimentality vs. intellectuality

To: F_MINOR@email.rutgers.edu
Subject: Sentimentality vs. intellectuality
From: flavio graf <flaviograf@altavista.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:20:03 +0000
Delivered-to: F_MINOR@EMAIL.RUTGERS.EDU
Reply-to: flavio graf <flaviograf@altavista.net>
Sender: "Mailing list devoted to the discussion of Glenn Gould's work and life." <F_MINOR@email.rutgers.edu>

This is a very old argument and one in which I am inclined to favour the non-nominalist. Those are: The ones that do not award a "real" title to which for me are abstractions of existence.
Separating intellect from feelings is not really in favour in current ephistemology. I agree with this point of view since both are -at the end- interlinked chemical and electrical processes in the brain.
Gould's interpretation of Bach is a "living" interpretation not a maths theorem.
Flavio
--

_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup


1 cent a minute calls anywhere in the U.S.!

http://www.getpennytalk.com/cgi-bin/adforward.cgi?p_key=RG9853KJ&url=http://www.getpennytalk.com

Prev by Date: Emotional Glenn Gould?
Next by Date: Gould, Sentiment and Chopin
Previous by thread: Emotional Glenn Gould?
Next by thread: Gould, Sentiment and Chopin
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread