[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GG-Shostakovich Quintet
- To: f_minor@email.rutgers.edu
- Subject: Re: GG-Shostakovich Quintet
- From: Michael Arnowitt <arnowitt@sover.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:55:54 -0500
- Comments: SoVerNet Verification (on garnet.sover.net)default from pm0a19.mont.sover.net [209.198.93.147] 209.198.93.147Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:47:34 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: f_minor-og@email.rutgers.edu
- Sender: owner-f_minor@email.rutgers.edu
At 04:51 PM 02/12/2000 -0800, you wrote:
>...
>As to modernism, his approach to the Quintet is more like Schumann than
>anything else. Is this a High Romantic side of Gould emerging, or a
>backhanded commentary on Shostakovich's premodern Russian style? I know my
>jaw dropped when I read (in Friedrich?) that GG had performed the Glinka
>"Trio Pathetique" at some Festival or other in Canada. That's a piece I have
>a kind of guilty fondness for, but it's not, um, very good music; I
>described the slow movement to a friend as "a Chopin Nocturne, but without
>talent."
>
Gould in one of the interviews in the GG Reader said he liked Glinka, well,
early Glinka anyway. I think it was in a conversation with Monsaingeon
about Mozart where they started to wander...
The original poster wondered if Gould had written anything about
Shostakovich. Again, I think in the GG Reader there is at least one article
GG wrote surveying a number of Russian composers. I'm sure there must be
some coverage of Shostakovich there. I have a memory of Gould basically
saying the only truly first-rate Russian composer was Prokofiev.
As you can perhaps guess, I don't own a copy of the GG Reader -- I've always
gone to my local library (just a few blocks away) and borrowed theirs.
Recently I did try to order one from a local book store and was told it's
out of print. I hope, if that is true, that the GG Foundation would make it
a priority to ensure that a new print run is done.
Michael