[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GG Chopin

To: <f_minor@email.rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: GG Chopin
From: music@netlink.co.uk (Neil Tingley)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 10:00:25 GMT
Delivered-to: f_minor-og@email.rutgers.edu
In-reply-to: <9803262146.AA22901@neon.ci.lexington.ma.us>
References: <9803262146.AA22901@neon.ci.lexington.ma.us>
Reply-to: music@netlink.co.uk
Sender: owner-f_minor@email.rutgers.edu

On Thu, 26 Mar 98 16:51:18 -0500, you wrote :

>And I wouldn't say that Gould set out to destroy Mozart or the "Appassionata", I would say he set out to "improve" them ;)

Well he set out to debunk them or perhaps to destroy people's preconceptions
about the works. Volumes III & IV of the mozart sonatas are awful ! An
experiment which doesn't work and the Appassionata fairs little better !

References:
- Re: GG Chopin
  - From: David Dahlbom <ddahlbom@neon.ci.lexington.ma.us>

Prev by Date: [no subject]
Next by Date: GG: Casual Wear
Previous by thread: Re: GG Chopin
Next by thread: RE: GG Chopin
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread