[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: GG: Gould & competition
Well, of course, you will never convince people of this, but
there is really no way to "beat the market." Sure, you can
UNDERperform the market if, for example, you don't diversify
away your alpha risk, but otherwise the market is in equilibrium
and all premiums for beta risk are appropriate for investors
seeking that risk level.
But wait, you say, how did the market achieve such equilibrium?
Well, the industry of investment analysis is like any other
industry; the commodity will be provided at the level at which
marginal benefit equals marginal cost, and there is always room
for one more professional if that's really what you want to do
with your life. But otherwise, from a MATHEMATICAL perspective,
the best thing is just to find some low-cost way to "ride the
market" and enjoy the fruits that are already there without
thinking that somehow the system can be "beat." BTW, check out
how the "professionals" compare against the dartboard: not very
favorably, I'm afraid. (Although they do a little better at
finding very small anomalies and exploiting them with large
amounts of money.)
But what about Mr. Gould, you say? Well, who knows. I
certainly don't know enough about that anecdotal evidence, or
any of the other anecdotal evidence about someone who was
"really smart" and made a lot of money. First of all, we don't
know what kind of exposure to other less favorable outcomes the
individual experienced during the relevant period of time.
Furthermore, we don't know what kind of favorable outcomes would
nonetheless been experienced had different decisions been made.
So it's not very helpful.
mw :-)
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: GG: Gould & competition
Author: <llalonde@lightspeed.net> at internet
Date: 2/10/97 7:54 PM
Alun Severn wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Has anyone else noted the contradiction in GG's attitude to competition? He
> loathed competitive behaviour and believed all forms of competition to be
> inherently corrupting; and yet, throughout his life, it is noted that he
> played the stock market -- the prime expression of capitalist competition
> -- extremely successfully....
>
> Another Gould oddity.
>
> Regards, Alun
I believe GG's feelings about competition were specific to music. My
feeling is that Gould believed music was to exist for its own sake.
Competition would take the focus off the music and put it on the
musician. The same was true for live performances which he also
loathed.
Gould recognized patterns. He appreciated music most which contained
complex patterns. When he described the 12 tone system and music
written with it, he seemed almost euphoric.
Perhaps the stock market offered another opportunity to observe
patterns. I have never understood the stock market or how it works,
but it does seem to me those who are most successful at playing it are
careful observers, just as Glenn Gould was.
Lori Lalonde