[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [F_minor] (no subject)



Could anybody really deny that Dmitry Sitkovetsky's adaptation of the Goldberg Variations for 3-4 strings is anything less than perfect and brilliant?

It's hard to think of a composer of music in any genre, from any era, for whom specific instrumentation matters less than that of Bach. Isn't this a defining characteristic of his greatness?
* At 12:33 PM 10/13/2008, Brad Lehman wrote:
Ronald Brander wrote:
The range of compositions in the Well Tempered Clavier alone convinces
    > me that Bach would've delighted in both the piano and the forte of
    > the modern instrument.  Gould's performance I'm sure would've
    > received a hearty applause from Johann.
Considering the effect the somewhat modern piano had on Beethoven,
    > I can only wonder how the modern instrument might've influenced
    > both Bach's and Mozart's music.

We have the music that Bach *did* write after encountering (and probably *for*) the early fortepiano: the two ricercars in the Musical Offering. They're both fiercely contrapuntal, but with a healthy dose of episodic freedom in them, too -- as he also did with the Art of Fugue. And there is not a single marking of "forte" or "piano" in either of them. They work on whatever keyboard instrument one happens to have handy. I play them on harpsichord, clavichord, fortepiano, and organ....

If Bach (or Mozart) had had a completely "modern" piano, he might have written entirely different music. And, what's modern about the design of the "modern" Steinway or Baldwin? The basic features haven't changed in 100 years!

   Brad Lehman
   _______________________________________________
   F_minor mailing list
   F_minor@email.rutgers.edu
   https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor


_______________________________________________
F_minor mailing list
F_minor@email.rutgers.edu
https://email.rutgers.edu/mailman/listinfo/f_minor